What did Imtiaz Jaleel say?
Imtiaz Jaleel said that all the rules set by the police were grossly violated in the meeting of Raj Thackeray. Despite this, the police did not take any action. We are also waiting what action the police will take against the MNS chief and the workers. He said that if the meeting had ended at 9.30 pm, an FIR should have been registered against him at 10 am. Why is the government and the police sitting silent? What kind of logic is that? Does Uddhav Thackeray love his brother more than the law, is there a different rule for him? Jalil said that the Home Ministry of the Maharashtra government is with the NCP. If he thinks that there will be an alliance with MNS in the coming elections, then how will it be possible? Is this why action is not being taken? He said that he would not allow this to happen at all.
So just write it down…
AIMIM MP Imtiaz Jaleel said that if action is not taken against Raj Thackeray, then our role is completely clear for the future. He said that the rule is same for all. If action is not taken against them, then it cannot be done against me either. You keep it in writing, if the police do not take strict action against the MNS chief, then I will hold a meeting on the same ground with more public than him. Apart from this, I will use better language than the language in which he has spoken.
MNS on the back foot?
After this move of Raj Thackeray, the discussion has started in the politics of Maharashtra whether MNS has come on the back foot after the strictness of the government. On the other hand, Maharashtra Home Minister Dilip Walse Patil has also decided to investigate Raj Thackeray’s speech in Aurangabad.