Know the difference between the powers of the British Crown and the President of India

Britain’s longest-serving Queen Elizabeth Didn’t stay He died at the age of 96. She has been the Head of State of Britain as well as being the Queen, just like the President is called the Head of State in India. Even though there may be this similarity between the two, but in many ways there has been a sky-high difference in the rights and powers of both.

Constitutionally also, there are many differences in the powers of the British King / Queen and the Indian President, which show that in some cases the Indian President has been more powerful than the British Queen or King in some cases. Know the difference between the rights and powers of both

  1. Both are constitutional posts, but the monarchy is constitutionally applicable in Britain. The Indian President does not have any such mechanism and is elected through voting. At the same time, this does not happen in the case of the King or Queen of Britain. The royal family takes the decision to choose them and one generation after the other gets this right, that is, everything is hereditary.
  2. The head of the Commonwealth of Nations is the head of the British crown. The country is dominated by royal houses, property and palaces. At the same time, the President of India does not have any such power. He is the head of only one country.
  3. The Indian President has a fixed term of his own, after completing which he has to leave office. This does not happen with the king or queen sitting on the royal throne in Britain. For example, for 70 years, the Queen has been occupying the marriage throne. Now after death, Prince Charles will sit on it.
  4. Members of Britain’s Parliament ie the House of Lords can ask questions to the ruler sitting on the royal throne, which they have to answer. There is no such rule for the President in India. Constitutionally the President cannot be questioned. He is not bound to answer any question.
  5. Now also know what are the similarities between the two terms. There is no age limit for the post of President in India. At the same time, constitutionally in Britain, there is no age restriction regarding this. For example, the 96-year-old queen has ruled for 70 years.
  6. The status of the posts for both is symbolic. If understood in simple language, barring a few exceptions, most of these decisions are taken on the advice of the Prime Minister and his cabinet. They put their stamp on their decisions.
  7. Both give information about the policies and works of the government in their address. The positive attitude of the government’s works is visible in his speech.

Get the more Knowledge information